Vijayakumar Associates

Practice · 03

Indirect Tax Litigation

The firm's original practice. Anchored in nearly four decades on the file.

Classical stone staircase with columns

The firm's indirect-tax practice has been led by its founding partner since 1989 — Sales Tax and Central Excise then; VAT, Service Tax, and GST since. We appear before the Madras High Court and the appellate tribunals. The statute names have changed; the underlying discipline — careful statutory reading, command of the facts, sharp framing of the issue — has not.

Where I appear

  • Madras High Court
  • GST Appellate Tribunal and predecessor sales-tax tribunals
  • CESTAT (Central Excise & Service Tax)
  • Departmental adjudications and revision proceedings

Matters typically handled

  • Constitutional challenges. Vires of provisions, retrospective amendments, levy disputes.
  • Classification and rate disputes. Tariff classification, exemption notifications, rate of tax.
  • Input tax credit. Denial, reversal, recovery — the busiest GST litigation theme of the past five years.
  • Valuation. Related-party transactions, free supplies, post-supply discounts.
  • Refund matters. Particularly export refunds and inverted-duty-structure refunds under GST.
  • Search, seizure, and prosecution. Writ proceedings against high-handed departmental action.
  • Advance rulings. Strategic use of AAR for clarity ahead of business decisions.

A note on advisory

A meaningful share of indirect-tax work happens before the show-cause notice arrives. We advise corporate clients on the tax position of new contracts, restructurings, and inter-state arrangements — the kind of opinion that, written well, either prevents the dispute or wins it before the adjudicating authority.